On 2017-06-13 22:23, Tom Lane wrote: > I could not find any places where reverting this change made the > results worse, so I'm unclear on why you made it.
I must admit I'm a bit confused about why it's not fixed yet, but I'll have to analyze that later this week. But the idea was to convince indent that the following is not a declaration and therefore it shouldn't be formatted as such: typedef void (*voidptr) (int *); -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
