On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 03:50:29AM +0300, Sergey Burladyan wrote: > 20 июн. 2017 г. 1:21 пользователь "Bruce Momjian" <br...@momjian.us> написал: > > > We are saying that Log-Shipping should match "Latest checkpoint > location", but the WAL for that will not be sent to the standby, so it > will not match, but that is OK since the only thing in the non-shipped > WAL file is the checkpoint record. How should we modify the wording on > this? > > > I am afraid that without this checkpoint record standby cannot make > restartpoint > and without restartpoint it does not sync shared buffers into disk at > shutdown.
Uh, as I understand it the rsync is going to copy the missing WAL file from the new master to the standby, right, and I think pg_controldata too, so it should be fine. Have you tested to see if it fails? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
