Hi,

When promoting a standby without using the "fast promotion" logic,
e.g. by using recovery targets (which doesn't use fast promotion for
unbeknownst to me reasons), checkpointer doesn't necessarily respect
archive timeout for the first cycle after promotion.  The reason for
that is that it determines the sleep times like
                if (XLogArchiveTimeout > 0 && !RecoveryInProgress())
                {
                        elapsed_secs = now - last_xlog_switch_time;
                        if (elapsed_secs >= XLogArchiveTimeout)
                                continue;               /* no sleep for us ... 
*/
                        cur_timeout = Min(cur_timeout, XLogArchiveTimeout - 
elapsed_secs);
                }
and RecoveryInProgress() will still return true.  We just fudge that
when creating the end-of-recovery checkpoint:
                        /*
                         * The end-of-recovery checkpoint is a real checkpoint 
that's
                         * performed while we're still in recovery.
                         */
                        if (flags & CHECKPOINT_END_OF_RECOVERY)
                                do_restartpoint = false;

One easy way to fix that would be to just wakeup the checkpointer from
the startup process once at the end of recovery, but it'd not be
pretty.   I think it'd be better to change the
                        do_restartpoint = RecoveryInProgress();

                        /*
                         * The end-of-recovery checkpoint is a real checkpoint 
that's
                         * performed while we're still in recovery.
                         */
                        if (flags & CHECKPOINT_END_OF_RECOVERY)
                                do_restartpoint = false;

into having a per-loop 'local_in_recovery' variable, that we turn off
once a CHECKPOINT_END_OF_RECOVERY checkpoint is requested.

Comments?

Greetings,

Andres Freund


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to