On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> Did you ever try running a pgbench SELECT benchmark, having modified >> things such that all PKs are on columns that are not of type >> int4/int8, but rather are of type numeric? It's an interesting >> experiment, that I've been meaning to re-run on a big box. > >> Obviously this will be slower than an equivalent plain pgbench SELECT, >> but the difference may be smaller than you expect. > > I'm not sure what that has to do with the topic?
It suggests that cache misses are much more important than anything else. Even with collated text, the difference is not so large IIRC. Though, it was noticeably larger. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
