Yes, for the example given in the Reddit post I would tend to agree. This is one of those issues where for the most part the solution is better naming conventions but for the few instances where this isn't possible it is a right pain.
-- View this message in context: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/Revisiting-NAMEDATALEN-tp5969858p5969860.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers