On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coe...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Conclusion: >> As seen from the test results mentioned above, there is some performance >> improvement with 3 SP(s), with 5 SP(s) the results with patch is slightly >> better than HEAD, with 7 and 10 SP(s) we do see regression with patch. >> Therefore, I think the threshold value of 4 for number of subtransactions >> considered in the patch looks fine to me. >> > > Thanks for the tests. Attached find the rebased patch on HEAD. I have ran > latest pgindent on patch. I have yet to add wait event for group lock waits > in this patch as is done by Robert in commit > d4116a771925379c33cf4c6634ca620ed08b551d for ProcArrayGroupUpdate. >
I have updated the patch to support wait events and moved it to upcoming CF. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
group_update_clog_v13.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
