Hi, On 2017-07-06 20:26:29 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > > But is this possible, or feasible? I see that the makefile refers to > > Possible yes, but in general I'm not a big fan of duplicating code. I > spend too much time to keep those copies in sync.
Indeed. I'm quite strongly against exposing / using pgtypeslib in more places. If anything it should be phased out. Because that code is definitely not always kept up2date, and it's a lot of work to do so. If anything the code should be rewritten to *not* require so much duplication, then we could talk. > > How much of the source tree would I have to carve out? > > Or from another perspective; how do other language (if any) solve this? > > I'm not aware of any other language binding for pgtypeslib. Some people use http://libpqtypes.esilo.com/ Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
