On Jul 10, 2017 16:08, "Tom Lane" <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 09:56:33AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Yeah, being able to reproduce the problem reliably enough to say whether >> it's fixed or not is definitely the sticking point here. I have some >> ideas about that: ... > I tried this procedure without finding a single failure. Thanks for testing! But apparently we still lack some critical part of the recipe for getting failures in the wild. > I watched the ensuing memory maps, which led me to these interesting facts: > An important result of the ASLR design in Windows Vista is that some address > space layout parameters, such as PEB, stack, and heap locations, are > selected once per program execution. Other parameters, such as the location > of the program code, data segment, BSS segment, and libraries, change only > between reboots. > ... > This offset is selected once per reboot, although we’ve uncovered at least > one other way to cause this offset to be reset without a reboot (see > Appendix II). > -- http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/reference/Address_ Space_Layout_Randomization.pdf That is really interesting, though I'm not quite sure what to make of it. It suggests though that you might need certain types of antivirus products to be active, to create more variability in the initial process address space layout than would happen from Windows ASLR alone. > I recommend pushing your patch so the August back-branch releases have it. > One can see by inspection that your patch has negligible effect on systems > healthy today. I have a reasonable suspicion it will help some systems. If > others remain broken after this, that fact will provide a useful clue. Okay, so that leaves us with a decision to make: push it into beta2, or wait till after wrap? I find it pretty scary to push a patch with portability implications so soon before wrap, but a quick look at the buildfarm suggests we'd get runs from 3 or 4 Windows members before the wrap, if I do it quickly. If we wait, then it will hit the field in production releases with reasonable buildfarm testing but little more. That's also pretty scary. On balance I'm tempted to push it now for beta2, but it's a close call. Thoughts? Given the lack of windows testing on non packaged releases I think we should definitely push this for beta2. That will give it a much better real world testing on what is still a beta. If it breaks its a lot better to do it in beta2 (and possibly quickly roll a beta3) than in production. /Magnus
