On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Etsuro Fujita <fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > So, I dropped the COPY part.
Ouch. I think we should try to figure out how the COPY part will be handled before we commit to a design. I have to admit that I'm a little bit fuzzy about why foreign insert routing requires all of these changes. I think this patch would benefit from being accompanied by several paragraphs of explanation outlining the rationale for each part of the patch. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
