On 2017/07/11 18:57, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:16 AM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: >> So whatever we land on needs to mention partition_of and >> has_partitions. Is that latter just its immediate partitions? >> Recursion all the way down? Somewhere in between? >> > > We have patches proposed to address some of those concerns at [1] > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpRcs5fOSfaAGAjT5C6=yvdd7mrx3knf_spb5dqzojgj...@mail.gmail.com
ISTM, David is talking about the "list tables" (bare \d without any pattern) case. That is, listing partitioned tables as of type "partitioned table" instead of "table" as we currently do. The linked patch, OTOH, is for "describe table" (\d <object_name_pattern>) case. Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
