Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So array[] should produce '{}' of (an array) type determined by the > context? OK -- seems easy enough.
Is it? I think we'd decided that this could only reasonably be handled by creating a datatype representing array-of-UNKNOWN. I'm afraid to do that because I think it might allow the parser's type resolution algorithms to follow paths we will not like. Perhaps it can be made to work, but I think it will require some careful study. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings