Greetings, * Sokolov Yura (y.soko...@postgrespro.ru) wrote: > I wrote two days ago about vacuum ring buffer: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8737e9bddb82501da1134f021bf4929a%40postgrespro.ru > > Increasing Vacuum's ring buffer to size of Bulk Writer's one reduces > autovacuum time in 3-10 times. > (for both patched and unpatched version I used single non-default > setting > 'autovacuum_cost_delay=2ms'). > > This is single line change, and it improves things a lot.
Right- when the database fits in the OS cache but not in shared_buffers. I do agree that's a useful improvement to make based on your testing. It's not clear off-hand how much that would improve this case, as the database size appears to pretty quickly get beyond the OS memory size (and only in the first test is the DB starting size less than system memory to begin with). Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
