On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfre...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, the 64x increase may be justifiable in absolute terms: it's not > unlikely that a 16MB buffer will be evicted from the OS cache before > vacuum is done with it, even in heavily throttled vacuums.
Sorry, that should read "It's not *likely* that a 16MB buffer will be evicted" -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
