On 2017-07-25 13:10:11 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Is this assumption, like, documented someplace? > > > > Uh, right there? > > I don't think we can expect end-users to read the code comments to > determine whether their apparently-legal SQL is fully supported.
I don't think plain end-users are going to create differently named PLs using builtin handlers. There's plenty special casing of system object in pg_dump and elsewhere. Dependency tracking doesn't quite work right if you refer to system objects either, etc. This is superuser only stuff, for a reason. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
