On 2017/07/25 5:35, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
I mean constraints derived from WITH CHECK OPTIONs specified for parent
views. We use the words "WITH CHECK OPTION constraints" in comments in
nodeModifyTable.c, so the expression "CHECK OPTION constrains" doesn't sound
not that bad to me. (I used "CHECK OPTION", not "WITH CHECK OPTION",
because we use "CHECK OPTION" a lot more in the documentation than "WITH
CHECK OPTION".)
Yeah, it seems OK to me, too; if the consensus is otherwise, we also
have the option to change it later.
Agreed.
Committed and back-patched as you
had it, but I removed a spurious comma.
Thanks for that, Robert! Thanks for reviewing, Horiguchi-san!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
