On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2017/07/13 19:57, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Amit Langote >> <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> The description of \d[S+] currently does not mention that it will list >>> materialized views and foreign tables. Attached fixes that. >>> >> >> I guess the same change is applicable to the description of \d[S+] NAME as >> well. > > Thanks for the review. Fixed in the attached.
The problem with this, IMV, is that it makes those lines more than 80 characters, whereas right now they are not. And that line seems doomed to get even longer in the future. Of course, having it be inaccurate is not great either. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
