On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > Oid is probably not good enough - with parallel tests and such it's not > necessarily predicable. Even less so when the tests are run against an > existing cluster. Sorting by name would probably be better...
It's arguably more user-friendly, too, although part of me feels like it would be better to try to preserve the topological ordering in some way. If something cascades to foo and from there to bar and from there to baz to and from there to quux, emitting the messages as drop cascades to bar drop cascades to baz drop cascades to foo drop cascades to quux is arguably not going to be too helpful to the user in understanding the chain of events, however nice it may be for regression testing purposes. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
