On 2017-08-01 15:37:40 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 7/21/17 12:59, Robert Haas wrote: > > That's an exceedingly-weak argument for rejecting this patch. The > > fact that you can probably hack around the lack of a hook for most > > reasonable use cases is not an argument for having a hook that does > > what people actually want to do. > > Still nobody has presented a concrete use case so far.
Citus for example starts a background worker (performing e.g. distributed deadlock detection) if the citus extension exists. We atm need annoying hacks to do so when the first query is executed. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
