On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Michael, > > * Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: >> > * Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote: >> >> Do you need a back-patchable version for 9.6? I could get one out of >> >> my pocket if necessary. >> > >> > I was just trying to find a bit of time to generate exactly that- if >> > you have a couple spare cycles, it would certainly help. >> >> OK, here you go. Even if archive_mode = always has been introduced in >> 9.5, but non-exclusive mode is a 9.6 feature, so here are patches down >> to this version. I am pretty satisfied by this, and I included all the >> comments and error message corrections reviewed up to now. I noticed >> some incorrect comments, doc typos and an incorrect indentation as >> well for the WARNING reported to the user when waiting for the >> archiving. > > Thanks much for this. I've looked over it some and it looks pretty good > to me. I'm going to play with it a bit more and, barring issues, will > push them tomorrow morning. >
Thank you for the patches, Michael-san! It looks good to me too. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers