On 8/7/17 00:32, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 04:09:43PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> On 8/1/17 00:17, Noah Misch wrote: >>>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Peter, >>>> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this >>>> open >>>> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as >>>> a >>>> v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on >>>> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days >>>> of >>>> this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers >>>> may >>>> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all >>>> fixed >>>> well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your >>>> efforts >>>> toward speedy resolution. Thanks. >>> >>> I'm looking into this now and will report by Friday. >> >> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send >> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent >> status >> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com > > I think this open item has closed by the commit > 7e174fa793a2df89fe03d002a5087ef67abcdde8 ?
Yes. I have updated the wiki page now. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
