On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Attached is a quick sketch of how this could perhaps be done (ignoring > > for the moment the relatively-boring opclass pushups). > > Here it is with some relatively-boring opclass pushups added. I just > did the int4 bit; the same thing will need to be done, uh, 35 more > times. But you get the gist. No, not that kind of gist. > > I will work on this. I have a small query, what if I want a cache entry with extended hash function instead standard one, I might require that while adding hash_array_extended function? Do you think we need to extend lookup_type_cache() as well? Regards, Amul
