On 7/6/17 21:06, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 6/27/17 01:21, Thomas Munro wrote: >>> Commit ea9df812d8502fff74e7bc37d61bdc7d66d77a7f got rid of >>> FirstPredicateLockMgrLock, but it's still referred to in a comment in >>> predicate.c where the locking protocol is documented. I think it's >>> probably best to use the name of the macro that's usually used to >>> access the lock array in the code. Please see attached. >> >> Does this apply equally to PredicateLockHashPartitionLock() and >> PredicateLockHashPartitionLockByIndex()? Should the comment mention or >> imply both? > > Yeah, I guess so. How about listing the hashcode variant, as it's the > more commonly used and important for a reader to understand of the > two, but mentioning the ByIndex variant in a bullet point below? Like > this.
Committed and backpatched to 9.4. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
