Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 1 September 2017 at 15:19, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> This patch makes me itch. Why is it correct for these three checks, >> and only these three checks out of the couple dozen uses of isTopLevel >> in standard_ProcessUtility, to instead do something else?
> No problem, it was a quick fix, not a deep one. My thought is that what we need to do is find a way for isTopLevel to be false if we're processing a multi-command string. It looks like exec_simple_query is already doing the right thing in terms of what it tells PortalRun; why is that not propagating down to ProcessUtility? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers