Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 1 September 2017 at 15:19, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> This patch makes me itch.  Why is it correct for these three checks,
>> and only these three checks out of the couple dozen uses of isTopLevel
>> in standard_ProcessUtility, to instead do something else?

> No problem, it was a quick fix, not a deep one.

My thought is that what we need to do is find a way for isTopLevel
to be false if we're processing a multi-command string.  It looks
like exec_simple_query is already doing the right thing in terms
of what it tells PortalRun; why is that not propagating down to
ProcessUtility?

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to