On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 1:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Thinking ahead, are we going to add a new --no-objecttype switch every >> time someone wants it? > > I'd personally be fine with --no-whatever for any whatever that might > be a subsidiary property of database objects. We've got > --no-security-labels, --no-tablespaces, --no-owner, and > --no-privileges already, so what's wrong with --no-comments? > > (We've also got --no-publications; I think it's arguable whether that > is the same kind of thing.)
And --no-subscriptions in the same bucket. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
