On 9/3/17, 11:46 PM, "Michael Paquier" <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > I did not consider first that the list portion also needed to be > modified, perhaps because I am not coding that myself... So now that > it is becoming more complicated what about just using AutovacMemCxt? > This would simplify the list of VacuumRelation entries and the > RangeVar creation as well, and honestly this is ugly and there are no > other similar patterns in the backend code:
+1 > This would become way more readable by using makeRangeVar() and the > new makeVacuumRelation. As this is partly my fault that we are at this > state, I am fine as well to remove this burden from you, Nathan, and > fix that myself in a new version. And I don't want to step on your > toes either :) No worries, I can take care of it. I appreciate your patience with all of these reviews. Nathan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
