On 4 September 2017 at 12:11, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's not really true that the only alternatives to pglogical are > proprietary. Really, one could use any logical replication solution, > and there have been multiple open source alternatives for a decade.
True, but it is by far the best solution out of the many choices. Which is why next year when upgrading from PG10 -> PG11 we will mention it and that point not mention the other older solutions, which were once our best. >> Our docs mention pglogical already, so don't see an issue with >> mentioning it here. > > The existing reference is alongside a bunch of other third-party > tools. Mentioning it at the very top of our release notes would give > it a pride of place with which I'm not too comfortable. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
