On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 10:33:37PM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> > > > wrote: > > > >> There are currently two failing SSL tests which at least to me seems more > > >> like they test specific OpenSSL behaviors rather than something which > > >> need > > >> to be true for all SSL libraries. > > > > > I don't know what we should do about these issues. > > > > Maybe the SSL test suite needs to be implementation-specific as well. > > If only two tests fail currently, I suggest that the thing to do is to > split it up in generic vs. library-specific test files. It should be > easy to do with the TAP framework -- just move the library-specific > tests to their own file and mark it as skipped at the start of the file > when a different library is detected.
This seems like a much smarter and more reliable way to test. Best, David. -- David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
