On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, David Blasby wrote:
> > My first guess would be that you're not running in "C" locale
> > on the 7.3 system. I get false on my 7.3.1 system in C locale,
> > but if I compare the two strings in C using en_US for example I
> > seem to get results like the above ('_'<'5' is true).
>
> It turns out our 7.3 database was somehow initd with local "en_US".
> But in MS vc++:
>
> TRACE("locale set to 'en_US'\n");
> setlocale( LC_ALL, "English_United States" );
> if (strcoll("_5","5") <0 )
> TRACE("strcoll('_5','5') -- <0 \n");
> else
> TRACE( "strcoll('_5','5') -- >=0\n");
>
> returns:
> locale set to 'en_US'
> strcoll('_5','5') -- <0
>
>
> Which is to say postgresql thinks "_5" > "5", but
> (a bit strangely) "_" < "5" (the '>' and '<' are reversed).
>
> vc++ thinks "_5" < "5" and "_" < "5".
>
> So, which one is correct and why does the other disagree?
Probably different definitions of the locale.
What type of system is the server on?
Under Redhat 9, en_US, doing a small C program
#include <stdio.h>
#include <locale.h>
#include <string.h>
int main() {
setlocale( LC_ALL, "en_US" );
printf("%d\n", strcoll("_5", "5"));
printf("%d\n", strcoll("_", "5"));
}
I get
1
-1
Which would appear to match what you're seeing from PostgreSQL.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
