Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:39:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Yeah, I see nothing about 3f902354b in release-10.sgml either. >> We've had varying policies over the years about whether to mention >> internal API changes in the release notes or not, but this one >> I think does belong there, since it's a silent API break rather >> than one that would easily be caught due to compiler errors. >> Bruce, did you have any specific reasoning for leaving it out?
> I doubt I saw that sentence in the paragraph. For long text like that, > I am usually looking for "BACKWARDS INCOMPATIBLE CHANGE" or something > like that. Sorry I missed it. I added something about this to the notes. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers