Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes: > personally I prefer syntax without FOR keyword - because following keyword > must be reserved keyword
> SET x = .., y = .. SELECT ... ; Nope. Most of the statement-starting keywords are *not* fully reserved; they don't need to be as long as they lead off the statement. But this proposal would break that. We need to put FOR or IN or another already-fully-reserved keyword after the SET list, or something's going to bite us. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers