On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Bossart, Nathan <bossa...@amazon.com> wrote: > I agree that it is nice to see when relations are skipped, but I do not > know if the WARNING messages would provide much value for this > particular use case (i.e. 'VACUUM;'). If a user does not provide a list > of tables to VACUUM, they might not care too much about WARNINGs for > dropped tables.
Some users trigger manual VACUUM with cron jobs in moments of low-activity as autovacuum may sometimes not be able to keep up with hte bloat cleanup. It seems to me that getting WARNING messages is particularly important for partitioned tables. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
