On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > The cause is that NO INHERIT doesn't take an exlusive lock on the > parent. This allows expand_inherited_rtentry to add the child > relation into appendrel after removal from the inheritance but > still exists. > > I see two ways to fix this. > > The first patch adds a recheck of inheritance relationship if the > corresponding attribute is missing in the child in > make_inh_translation_list(). The recheck is a bit complex but it > is not performed unless the sequence above is happen. It checks > duplication of relid (or cycles in inheritance) following > find_all_inheritors (but doing a bit different) but I'm not sure > it is really useful. > > > The second patch lets ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT to acquire locks on > the parent first. > > Since the latter has a larger impact on the current behavior and > we already treat "DROP TABLE child" case in the similar way, I > suppose that the first approach would be preferable. > > > Any comments or thoughts?
I agree that the second has less user impact, but I wonder if we can think that will really fix the bug completely, or more generally if it will fix all of the bugs that come from ALTER TABLE .. NO INHERIT not locking the parent. I have a sneaking suspicion that may be wishful thinking. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
