On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:54 PM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: > Should we be pointing the gun away from people's feet by making hash > partitions that cover the space automagically when the partitioning > scheme[1] is specified? In other words, do we have a good reason to have > only some of the hash partitions so defined by default?
Sure, we can add some convenience syntax for that, but I'd like to get the basic stuff working before doing that kind of polishing. If nothing else, I assume Keith Fiske's pg_partman will provide a way to magically DTRT about an hour after this goes in. But probably we can do better in core easily enough. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
