Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > Version correcting these is attached. Thanks!
I'd vote for undoing the s/st_activity/st_activity_raw/g business. That may have been useful while writing the patch, to ensure you found all the references; but it's just creating a lot of unnecessary delta in the final code, with the attendant hazards for back-patches. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers