Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> Looking into it.
I wonder whether we shouldn't just revert this patch altogether.
Certainly, extra reads of pg_control are not a noticeable performance
problem. I'm now quite worried about whether we aren't introducing
hazards of using stale values from the file; if a system crash isn't
enough to get it to flush its cache, then what is?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
