Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Now, for pg_stat_activity part of the argument why this wouldn't be >> confusing was that you could also see the "state" field. Maybe we >> should try to shoehorn equivalent info into the crash log entry?
> Yeah, I think so. Really, I think this is an inadvertency, and thus a > bug. But instead of just not showing the query when the backend is > idle, I'd change the display for that case to: > DETAIL: Failed process was idle; last query was: %s WFM. > Or something like that. I guess we'd need another case for a backend > that crashed without ever running a query. We already print nothing in that case, which seems fine. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers