Hi, On 2017-09-18 18:04:36 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Thomas Munro > <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > Here is a patch to fix that. > > Here's a better one (same code, corrected commit message).
Pushed. For a second I was tempted to also replace the palloc(sizeof(dshash_table)) with a palloc0 - but in the end it seems actually not too bad either to be able to catch bugs like this with some help. If you have a strong opinion either way... Thanks, Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
