On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The attached patch fixes both the review comments as discussed above.
This cost stuff looks unstable:
test select_parallel ... FAILED
! Gather (cost=0.00..623882.94 rows=9976 width=8)
Workers Planned: 4
! -> Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 (cost=0.00..623882.94 rows=2494 width=8)
(3 rows)
drop function costly_func(var1 integer);
--- 112,120 ----
explain select ten, costly_func(ten) from tenk1;
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
! Gather (cost=0.00..625383.00 rows=10000 width=8)
Workers Planned: 4
! -> Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 (cost=0.00..625383.00 rows=2500 width=8)
(3 rows)
drop function costly_func(var1 integer);
>From https://travis-ci.org/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/builds/277376953 .
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
