On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for all your review comments. Please find my comments in-line.
+ if (!BlockNumberIsValid(opaque->hasho_nextblkno))
+ {
+ if (so->currPos.buf == so->hashso_bucket_buf ||
+ so->currPos.buf == so->hashso_split_bucket_buf)
+ prev_blkno = InvalidBlockNumber;
+ else
+ prev_blkno = opaque->hasho_prevblkno;
+ }
1. Why not remove the outer "if" statement?
2. How about adding a comment, like /* If this is a primary bucket
page, hasho_prevblkno is not a real block number. */
> When _hash_readpage() doesn't find any qualifying tuples i.e. when
> _hash_readnext() returns Invalid buffer, we just update prevPage,
> nextPage and buf in
> currPos (not currPage or lsn) as currPage and lsn should point to last
> page in the hash bucket so that we can mark the killed items as dead
> at the end of scan (with the help of _hash_kill_items). Hence, we keep
> the currpage and lsn as it is if no more valid hash pages are found.
How about adding a comment about this, by extending this comment:
+ * Remember next and previous block numbers for scrollable
+ * cursors to know the start position and return FALSE
+ * indicating that no more matching tuples were found.
e.g. (Don't reset currPage or lsn, because we expect _hash_kill_items
to be called for the old page after this function returns.)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
