Andrew Dunstan <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 09/20/2017 06:13 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Those are around for some time, see here:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqTkW=b_1jvvywd_g0wrkot+4ufqjggrv8osqbuzzxg...@mail.gmail.com
>> But there has been no actual agreement about how to fix them..
> Oh. Missed that.
> My solution was going to be slightly different. I was going to enclose
> the #ifdef'd code in a bare block and move the rte declaration inside
> that block.
Of the various solutions proposed in the previous thread, I think the
most salable alternative is probably ilmari's: get rid of the variable
and write the assert like
Assert(planner_rt_fetch(rel->relid, root)->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY);
That's a pretty minimal change and it doesn't add any cycles to the
non-Assert case.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
