> Does this need fixing, and if so how? My improve geometric types patch [1] fixes this issue, by cosidering NaNs larger than any non-NAN same as the float types. There are many issues with the geometric types similar to this. Let's combine our efforts to put them into a shape.
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAE2gYzxF7-5djV6-cEvqQu-fNsnt=eqbourx7zdg+vv6zmt...@mail.gmail.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
