At 10:38 AM 12/07/2003 -0700, Stephan Szabo wrote:
 deferred after trigger row 1
 deferred after trigger #2 row a
 deferred after trigger row 2
 deferred after trigger #2 row b

I'd vote for this; ie. make them execute in the same order they would execute if they were not deferred. Otherwise you open up all sorts of weird application errors if a trigger is deferred/not-deferred.



---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to