Hi Thomas, I have attached the rebased version of patch here.
Kind Regards, Shubham On 8 September 2017 at 06:37, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Shubham, > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Shubham Barai <shubhambara...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > If these two hash keys (78988658 and 546789888) mapped to the same > bucket, this will result in false serialization failure. > > Please correct me if this assumption about false positives is wrong. > > I wonder if there is an opportunity to use computed hash values > directly in predicate lock tags, rather than doing it on the basis of > buckets. Perhaps I'm missing something important about the way that > locks need to escalate that would prevent that from working. > > > 3) tested my patch on the current head > > This no longer applies, but it's in "Needs review" status in the > Commitfest. Could you please post a rebased version? > > -- > Thomas Munro > http://www.enterprisedb.com >
Predicate-locking-in-hash-index_4.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
