On 25/09/17 19:48, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On 09/25/2017 10:43 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >> On 2017-09-25 10:38:52 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>> On 09/25/2017 10:32 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote: >>>> On 25/09/17 19:26, Tom Lane wrote: >>>>> Alvaro Hernandez <a...@ongres.com> writes: >>> >>>> >>>> There is already about 3 million output plugins out there so I think we >>>> did reasonable job there. The fact that vast majority of that are >>>> various json ones gives reasonable hint that we should have that one in >>>> core though. >>> >>> And I am sure that 2ndQuadrant would be happy to add it to their >>> version of >>> Postgres and maintain it themselves. >>> >>> https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/resources/2ndqpostgres/ >> >> This doesn't seem like a good way to argue. >> > > Sorry, that wasn't supposed to be negative. My point was that > 2ndQuadrant has a distribution of Postgres that they support. If > 2ndQuadrant wants the feature, they could add it to their own without > burdening the wider community further. It provides 2ndQuadrant what they > are arguing for, benefits 2ndQuadrant as it increases the visibility and > opportunity of their distribution for wider use. >
I am not sure I follow, we do have pglogical extension which works just fine for this, thanks. You might have noticed that it's not what I was suggesting we use for core. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers