On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:35:38PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > > is this code really a "replacement" for rserv? There has been work on > > rserv in contrib that I'm guessing was not used in the commercial > > version. are we better off calling this rserv2 or something and letting > > both projects stand side by side? > > Good point: this code branched back in the summer of 2001, and hasn't > had anything to do with the rserv code since. So perhaps both should > live. > > > as the person doing the legwork, do you see one location or the other as > > a hindrance to getting the release done? > > Not to me, no. But since I can't commit the changes to CVS, someone > else would have to do that. Mind you, last time I tried to set up a > project on gborg, I couldn't get it to work after 4 hours, and gave > up.
I'd say contrib is the natural place for it, as it's a todo item and a step towards integration. It's a feature most people can use, and if it's in /contrib it's more likely to get used than if it's on gborg. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster