Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2017-10-06 07:59:40 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> The only thing that gets me excited about a threaded postgres is the
>> ability to have a PL/Java, PL/Mono etc that don't suck. We could do
>> some really cool things that just aren't practical right now.
> Faster parallelism with a lot less reinventing the wheel. Easier backend
> / session separation. Shared caches.
What you guys are talking about here is a threaded backend, which is a
whole different matter from replacing the client-side threading that Nico
was looking at. That would surely offer far higher rewards, but the costs
to get there are likewise orders of magnitude greater.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
