On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 3:40 PM, amul sul <sula...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> natts represents the number of attributes, but for the hash partition bound >> we >> are not dealing with the attribute so that I have used short-form of >> dimension, >> thoughts? > > Okay, I think the dimension(dim) is also unfit here. Any suggestions? >
I think natts is ok, since we are dealing with the number of attributes in the pack of datums; esp. when ndatums is already taken. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
