On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Actually, that didn't take too long. > > No testing yet, but this runs a build successfully: > <https://gist.github.com/adunstan/7f18e5db33bb2d73f69ff8c9337a4e6c> > > See results at <https://ci.appveyor.com/project/AndrewDunstan/pgdevel>
Excellent! Thanks for looking at this, Andrew. It's going to be really useful for removing surprises. It would be nice to finish up with a little library of control files like this for different CI vendors, possibly with some different options (different compilers, different word size, add valgrind, ...). I don't know if it would ever make sense to have standardised CI control files in the tree -- many projects do -- but it's very easy to carry a commit that adds them in development branches but drop it as part of the format-patch-and-post process. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers