On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 9/24/17 07:00, Thomas Munro wrote: >> Fair point. In that case there are a few others we should consider >> moving down too for consistency, like in the attached. > >> Thanks, that is much tidier. Done that way in the attached. >> >> Here also is a small addition to your TAP test which exercises the >> non-NULL code path because slapd rejects TLS by default with a >> diagnostic message. I'm not sure if this is worth adding, since it >> doesn't actually verify that the code path is reached (though you can >> see that it is from the logs). > > Committed.
Thanks, and thanks also for follow-up commit 7d1b8e75. Looks like the new macro arrived in OpenLDAP 2.4 but RHEL5 shipped with 2.3. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
