On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 05:57:24PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 6 October 2017 at 14:03, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 10:32:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> (I do kinda wonder why we rolled our own RecursiveCopy; surely there's > >> a better implementation in CPAN?) > > > > Fewer people will test as we grow the list of modules they must first > > install. > > Meh, I don't buy that. At worst, all we have to do is provide a script > that fetches them, from distro repos if possible, and failing that > from CPAN. > > With cpanminus, that's pretty darn simple too.
If the tree had such a script and it were reliable, then yes, it would matter little whether the script procured one module or five. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers